PhilArchive
open access
Machine Ethology: Interaction as Umwelt in the Behaviour of Conversational Machines
This paper proposes an ethological framework for the empirical study of the behaviour of conversational machines, paradigmatically large language models. The canonical programme of machine behaviour (Rahwan et al., 2019) adapts Tinbergen's four questions to machines under an ecological premise: the machine is an actor immersed in a social ecosystem that pre-exists and persists independently of observation. This paper argues that the premise fails for the conversational machine, whose entire behavioural output is linguistic and elicited in exchange with a human interlocutor. It advances a single foundational thesis — the conversational machine's Umwelt (von Uexküll) is human interaction itself — from which two methodological consequences follow: the dissolution of the observer's paradox and the coincidence of observation and experiment. Under a Vichian epistemological warrant, the four Tinbergian questions are re-articulated for the interactional Umwelt and a fifth is added, proper to artefacts, concerning absence (the unsaid and the untrained). Each question is operationalised through prompting alone. The proposal is situated within recent convergent work (AI Agent Behavioral Science; Machine Culture) and specifically demarcated from so-called Machine Psychology. The document is bilingual (English and Italian).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Silence as a Statement: Recognition, Non-Response, and the Dynamics of Human–AI Dialogue#85885
- Clarify, Abstain or Answer? Strategising in Conversation with Belief-Augmented Generation#984165
- Fictive interaction and the nature of linguistic meaning#765089
- No Epistemic Respect for Bullshit Machines or LLMs#700064
- Modal Disagreements#744660
Record · ID 709464
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive