PhilArchive
open access
Art and religion: Inverting the primacy
On the basis of the conception of aesthetic imagination derived from evolutionary psychology, cognitive psychology, and social cognitive neuroscience, today it is possible - and more appropriate - to invert the traditional view of anthropologists and archeologists that conceives the arts (from the early pre-historic arts) as mere instruments supporting religious beliefs, practices, and rituals.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Maya Imagery, Architecture, and Activity: Space and Spatial Analysis in Art History ed. by Maline D. Werness-Rude and Kaylee R. Spencer#489161
- Estética, ciencia de la sensibilidad más allá del arte: propuestas para una estética etológica amplia#715641
- La triple dinámica: educación, ética y estética#723009
- Is the Sacred Older than the Gods?#700532
- The Formation of Styles: Science and the Applied Arts#751997
Record · ID 711695
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive