PhilArchive
open access
ChatGPT is not bullshit, nor is it not not bullshit
This paper intervenes in the debate over whether ChatGPT and other similar large language models (LLMs) are bullshit and answers that they are not. LLMs, however, don’t avoid being bullshitters in the way that humans do, i.e., by caring about the truth and avoiding deception. Rather, LLMs are not the kinds of things that can even count as bullshit. Attribut- ing the property of being a bullshitter to LLMs is a category mistake.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Chatbot Engagement Does Not Always Beget Metalearning: Evidence from Three Countries#1117070
- Clarify, Abstain or Answer? Strategising in Conversation with Belief-Augmented Generation#984165
- Loose Talk, Negation and Commutativity: A Hybrid Static - Dynamic Theory#708127
- Transphobia Is in the Eye of the Prompter: Trans-Centered Perspectives on Large Language Models#104939
- The problem of hallucinations in chatbots based on Large Language Models: an analysis from the perspective of the semantic theory of truth and the theory of quasi-truth#93353
Record · ID 714042
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive