PhilArchive
open access
Procreative Liberty: The Case for Preconception Sex Selection
Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons raises serious moral, legal and social issues. The main concerns include the threat of a sex ratio distortion due to a common preference for boys over girls, the charge of sexism, the danger of reinforcing gender stereotypical behaviour in sex selected children, and the fear of a slippery slope towards creating designer babies. This paper endeavours to show that none of the objections to preconception sex selection is conclusive and that there is no justification for denying parents the right to choose the sex of their prospective children.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Ten Most Common Objections to Sex Selection and Why They Fail To Be Conclusive#716804
- U.S. College Students’ Perspectives on Contraception and Abortion Post-<i>Dobbs</i>: The Influence of Socioeconomic Privilege and Gender Inequity#289455
- “Unmet Need for Abortion”: Conceptualization, Relevance, and Utility as a Tool for Meeting Abortion Needs in the United States#1106797
- Abortion Revisited#751000
- Preconception Gender Selection: A Threat to the Natural Sex Ratio?#716788
Record · ID 716789
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive