PhilArchive
open access
The Ten Most Common Objections to Sex Selection and Why They Fail To Be Conclusive
After its review of the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act of 1990, the Department of Health concluded that the British Parliament ought to outlaw sex selection for any but the most serious of medical reasons. This paper reviews the most frequently expressed objections to social sex selection and concludes that there is simply no moral justification for prohibiting parents from using sex selection technology to balance their families.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On the Compulsory Sex Education in England : An Analysis from the Aspect of Sexuality and Policy Making(<Special Issue><Sex> and Education)#68901
- Procreative Liberty: The Case for Preconception Sex Selection#716789
- Misuse of evidence in sex and gender policy#293949
- Regulating Sex: An Anthology of Commentaries on the Findings and Recommendations of the Badgley and Fraser Reports#494178
- Sex Selection and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine#716798
Record · ID 716804
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive