PhilArchive
open access
Natural Theology and Miracles: In Defense of Spectator Evidence
I mostly agree with most of what Paul Moser has said in his books in the Philosophy of Religion. The views he has defended are a needed corrective to the evidentialist paradigm in the philosophy of religion. At the same time, his development of his central ideas has resulted in views that are, somewhat idiosyncratic and extreme. In this essay I hope to present a different articulation of those ideas, also defensible from within a Christian perspective, that preserves their central thrust without being so extreme.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Understanding Kierkegaard’s Johannes Climacus in the Postscript#755494
- Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 1198): Reason and Unreason in Prophecy#84169
- Clustered on the Edge of Possibility: The Odd Distribution of Miracle Claims - 11#165272
- Consistent Standards of Evidence for Miracle Claims - 23#167429
- The" No Miracles" Justification of Induction#115799
Record · ID 721488
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive