PhilArchive
open access
On the Nature of Scientific Disagreement
This chapter highlights various aspects of scientific disagreement, with an eye on disagreements between peers. These include the scope and extent of scientific disagreements across disciplines. In part, differences in disagreement can be explained in terms of the various matters of dispute, such as the correct interpretation of data, or methodological, conceptual, and normative issues. The chapter also addresses whether and when (persistent) disagreement in science can be rational, and whether persistent disagreement is an impediment to progress in science. The concluding remarks touch upon additional issues, such as when economic or political stakeholders nurture scientific disagreement or even manufacture it.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Large Knowledge Model: From Papers to a Scientific Reasoning Landscape#1063508
- Disagreeing about disagreement#776533
- The epistemic benefits of religious disagreement#720902
- How AI Models Manage Epistemic Authority: A Taxonomy and Comparative Analysis of Responses to User Disagreement#984571
- Climate Change, Uncertainty and Policy#740525
Record · ID 722530
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive