arXiv (All)
open access
How AI Models Manage Epistemic Authority: A Taxonomy and Comparative Analysis of Responses to User Disagreement
Large language models are increasingly used as sources of advice and information, including in high-stakes settings, yet little is known about how they respond to user disagreement. We study how a model manages its epistemic authority, referring here to its claim to knowledge, competence, or the rig
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does ChatGPT Undermine Human Epistemic Authority? A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Artificial Intelligence's Challenge to Knowledge Systems#694668
- Authoritative Knowledge#736651
- AI and the scientist: On the fracture of epistemic authority#722535
- Disagreement and Intellectual Scepticism#122493
- Inferential Stability as an Epistemic Criterion: A Structural Inquiry into Doxastic Robustness#708608
Record · ID 984571
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive