PhilArchive
open access
Who is Dr. Frankenstein? Or, what Professor Hayek and his friends have done to science
This commentary suggests that the ongoing malaise of biomedical research results from adopting a doctrine that is incompatible with the principles of creative scientific discovery and thus should be treated as a mental rather than somatic disorder. I overview the progression of the malaise, outline the doctrine and the history of its marriage to science, formulate the diagnosis, justify it by reviewing the symptoms of the malaise, and suggest how to begin to cure the disease.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Neurophilosophy: A Bridge Between Science and Contemporary Philosophy#117655
- Hegel's Proto-Modernist Conception of Philosophy as Science#727410
- Worlding the Brain: Neurocentrism, Cognition and the Challenge of the Arts and Humanities#694854
- Telling tales: George Stroke and the historiography of holography#743208
- Personality is the Root of All Science and Philosophy#724820
Record · ID 725969
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive