PhilArchive
open access
Kantian Reflections on Conceptual Limits
This paper reflects on Kantian exchanges between A. W. Moore and Sorin Baiasu. After briefly situating their exchange, I highlight Baiasu’s clarification regarding Kant’s distinction between knowledge and cognition. Although convincing, I suggest that Baiasu’s objections could be strengthened with further discussion of the notion of a thing in itself as a limiting concept, as well as emphasis on Moore’s use of ‘concern’, which might require further clarification. I conclude with broader reflections on what is at stake: not just armchair knowledge, but the coherence and relevance of Kant’s practical philosophy under the assumption of its dependence on transcendental idealism.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Kants formaler Idealismus: eine phänomenalistische Interpretation#757643
- Kant as Both Conceptualist and Nonconceptualist#764707
- The Transcendental Object, Experience, and the Thing in Itself#757647
- The Problem of Method and Self-Knowledge in Kant's Transcendental Philosophy#110492
- Varieties of Transcendental Idealism: Kant and Heidegger Thinking Beyond Life#723291
Record · ID 727053
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive