PhilArchive
open access
Maxwell’s Demon Unbound: Infinite Memory, the Second Law, and the Limits of Physical Agency
The standard information-theoretic exorcism of Maxwell’s demon holds that a demon must eventually erase its memory, and that by Landauer’s principle this erasure produces enough entropy to save the second law. Whatever its merits, this resolution rests entirely on an unexamined premise: that the demon is finite. This paper asks what follows when the premise is dropped. I argue, first, that a demon with unbounded memory evades the Landauer accounting entirely, and that the standard reply, on which the demon’s growing record itself serves as an entropy sink, succeeds only relative to a description that treats the record as unknown, which for the demon it is not. Second, drawing on the Gibbsian tradition of Jaynes and Myrvold, I argue that the unbounded demon does not so much violate the second law as expose its status: the law is a constraint on what agents with bounded means can do, not a bare fact about matter. Third, I show that the microscopic reversibility of dynamics gives the unbounded demon a startling further power, the recoverability in principle of any past configuration, and I make explicit the no-collapse assumption on which this depends. Fourth, I argue that such a being is nonetheless impossible within the physical universe, on two independent grounds: the Bekenstein bound, which caps the information content of any bounded region, and self-measurement theorems, which forbid any internal system from perfectly knowing a whole that includes itself. The unbounded demon is thus exiled to the boundary of physics, where, as Tipler’s Omega Point and the older tradition of divine memory suggest, the concept has always had another name. The second law, I conclude, is best understood as the signature of finitude: the price an agent pays for being a part of the world rather than the whole of it.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 操作哲学 (Operable Philosophy)#726064
- Why Are We Hackable? Three Channels of Infiltration in Learning Systems: From Viruses to Algorithms#707575
- The Metaphysics of Free Will: A Critique of Free Won’t as Double Prevention#751821
- Defeating the Whole Purpose: A Critique of Ned Markosian's Agent-Causal Compatibilism#116118
- How Entropy Explains the Emergence of Consciousness: The Entropic Theory#106413
Record · ID 729883
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive