PhilArchive
open access
Conhecimento e significação prática - uma hipótese aristotélica
The purpose of this paper is to examine the peculiarity of what Aristotle named practical wisdom or practical knowledge. Pivot to our analysis is the first thesis of the Nicomachean Ethics, where the philosopher appears to state a fallacy when he argues that, given that all actions aim at some good, good is that which every action aims to. We argue that the inference is non-fallacious because of the peculiarity of the practical domain, which manifests itself in the identity of the good and the end. This identity is in the origin of what we would call, as an hypothesis, practical significance.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Aristotelian Notion of Phronesis and Its Indispensable Role in the Actualization of the Golden Mean#75384
- Originile disputei etice dintre particularism şi generalism: Platon şi Aristotel#756945
- Method in _NE_ VII.1–3#75873
- Wisdom – Knowledge – Belief. The Problem of Demarcation in Plato’s “Phaedo”#758658
- Aristotle and the necessity of scientific knowledge#116862
Record · ID 735630
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive