PhilArchive
open access
Testimonial Smothering’s Non-Epistemic Motives: A Reply to Goetze and Lee
I argue that according to Kristie Dotson, non-epistemic motives such as social, ethical and material harm can motivate a speaker to smother her testimony. I present this exegesis of Dotson's view of testimonial smothering in response to J. L. Lee's and Trystan Goetze's reply to my commentary of Lee's view that anticipatory epistemic injustice is distinct from testimonial smothering.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Testimonial Injustice and the Puzzle of Hearer Culpability#725955
- Foreknowledge and Free Will#702075
- Being in a Position to Know is the Norm of Assertion#777198
- Agency in the Space of Reasons. A Comment on _The Castle_#725882
- Prejudice in Testimonial Justification: A Hinge Account#702323
Record · ID 735874
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive