PhilArchive
open access
How Essential are Essential Laws? A Thought Experiment on Physical Things and Their Givenness in Adumbrations
Husserl holds the view that givenness through adumbrations (i.e. perspectival givenness) is an essential characteristic of the givenness of spatiotemporal things. He goes so far to say that we are dealing with an essential law. In this article I try to make sense of this claim. I am also dealing with a thought experiment that is designed to show that the givenness through adumbrations is just a consequence of our physiological make-up, a view that Husserl explicitly rejects. Amongst other things, I defend Husserl by introducing the crucial distinction between first-person-imagination and third-person-imagination.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Husserl on Collective Intentionality#119827
- On Reason and Spectral Machines: Robert Brandom and Bounded Posthumanism#763599
- From Extended Minds to Extended Persons#688741
- Phenomenology Without Context: A Critical Review of Mabaquiao on Husserl’s Intentionality#724720
- From Nature to Spirit: Husserl's Phenomenology of the Person in Ideen II#703855
Record · ID 738976
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive