PhilArchive
open access
Moral Responsibility and Mental Illness: a Call for Nuance
Does having a mental disorder, in general, affect whether someone is morally responsible for an action? Many people seem to think so, holding that mental disorders nearly always mitigate responsibility. Against this Naïve view, we argue for a Nuanced account. The problem is not just that different theories of responsibility yield different verdicts about particular cases. Even when all reasonable theories agree about what's relevant to responsibility, the ways mental illness can affect behavior are so varied that a more nuanced approach is needed.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SHARED DECISION-MAKING WITH PEOPLE WITH SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS#448634
- Mental Disorders and the Law#649850
- Rational framing effects and morally valid reasons#102145
- Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect: 'Theory of mind' and moral judgment#745620
- Why It Is Essential to Teach About Mental Health Issues in Criminal Law (And a Primer on How To Do It)#649818
Record · ID 744974
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive