PhilArchive
open access
Some Philosophical Aspects of Demythologising
What I have to say has no exclusive reference to biblical scholars or theologians. Even most of the mistakes and fallacies I want to point to and investigate are shared by others who also operate in a theological frame of mind. Otherwise the problems I want to raise are familiar problems of philosophy. They are problems we encounter in the philosophy of history when we distinguish between the actual occurrence and documentation of a happening, and the significance, meaning and interpretation of that happening.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Tanrı'yı Düşünmek: Rasyonel Teoloji Üzerine Bir Deneme (Gott denken: Ein Versuch über rationale Theologie)#82335
- Cele teologii naturalnej i filozoficznej a preferowane wartości poznawcze / Aims of Natural and Philosophical Theology and the Preferred Epistemic Values#759883
- From Moral Judgment to Confessed Authority#701211
- Ethical Decision‑Making in an Uncertain World: From Scenario Analysis to an Ontology of the Instability of Action#690878
- Part I: Why We Need to Revisit the Word of God – Preliminaries (continued)...conclusion to hermenuetics#710323
Record · ID 746082
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive