PhilArchive
open access
Agency in a deterministic world
In "Determined: A Science of Life Without Free Will", Sapolsky argues that determinism and free will are incompatible, emphasizing that our actions are shaped by genetics, brain chemistry, and environment, not conscious choice. This view challenges traditional ideas of moral responsibility, suggesting that people should not be blamed for actions they couldn’t control due to biological and social influences. Despite this, I argue that Sapolsky overlooks a potential space for agency within a deterministic framework. He examines conditioned learning and I believe this opens the door for both individual and collective agency. If behavior can be influenced by external forces, there may be room for us to shape our actions and society through environmental interventions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Illusion of Agency: Why Free Will Does Not Exist#102490
- An Argument For The Inexistence Of Free Will#112196
- Foreword#712412
- Explaining Free Will#727460
- Mental Causation and Free Will after Libet and Soon: Reclaiming Conscious Agency#698588
Record · ID 75640
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive