PhilArchive
open access
What Constitutes a Formal Analogy?
There is ample justification for having analogical material in standardized tests for graduate school admission, perhaps especially for law school. We think that formal-analogy questions should compare different scenarios whose structure is the same in terms of the number of objects and the formal properties of their relations. The paper deals with this narrower question of how legitimately to have formal analogy test items, and the broader question of what constitutes a formal analogy in general.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Singular Analogy and Quantitative Inductive Logics#776767
- The Principle of Analogy#703806
- On Augustine and 'Analogy': A Historical Note on the Philosophico-Theological Terminology of 'Analogy' in Latin Theology#167180
- Models and Analogies in Science#739859
- Cognitive Proportionality in Physical Theory Construction: Toward Computational Approaches in Philosophy of Physics -Artificial Intelligence-#90211
Record · ID 757955
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive