PhilArchive
open access
Hume and the External World
Hume’s understanding of the external world, particularly, his conception of objects, or what he occasionally refers to as “bodies,” is the subject of much dispute. Are objects mind-independent? Or, are they just what we see, feel, smell, taste, or touch? In other words, are objects just sense data? Or, are they ideas about sense data? Or, are objects, somehow, mind-independent, but we have ideas of them, and we receive sense data from them? In this paper, I provide some answers to these questions—by way of distinguishing between the vulgar position, the philosophical position, and Hume’s position.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Enactive Philosophy of Embodiment: From Biological Foundations of Agency to the Phenomenology of Subjectivity#770467
- The Perception/Cognition Divide: One More Time, with Feeling#746304
- Introduction to Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception#751747
- What It Is Like to Think: Consciousness and Intentionality#167394
- Expressivism, motivation internalism, and Hume#86202
Record · ID 763527
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive