PhilArchive
open access
The Trouble with Pseudoskepticism
The continuing rejection of anthropogenic global warming by non-experts despite overwhelming scientific consensus is rationally untenable and best described as “pseudoskeptical;” it is akin to AIDS denialism, the advocacy of intelligent design, and anti-vaccination movements.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Scratching where it doesn't itch: science denialism, expertise, and the probative value of scientific consensus#94872
- Computer models and the evidence of anthropogenic climate change: An epistemology of variety-of-evidence inferences and robustness analysis#775513
- Global Warming#391423
- Following the Science: Pandemic Policy Making and Reasonable Worst-Case Scenarios#702792
- Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors#711928
Record · ID 773440
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive