Conceptio › Archive › arXiv (All)
arXiv (All) open access

Remote Human and Robot Interaction for Greenhouse Gardening Using Virtual Reality

Udekwe, Daniel et al. · arxiv_all
arXiv (All) · Papers
Open Source ↗Direct PDF ↓
roboticssystems-and-control
This study evaluates the effectiveness of remote human-robot interaction using virtual reality for leaf inspection and soil moisture assessment in a greenhouse environment. The robotic system comprised an unmanned ground vehicle and a robotic manipulator equipped with cameras, governed by kinematic
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

[2608.27545] Remote Human-Robot Interaction In Greenhouses via Virtual Reality: How Plant Canopy Structure Affects Leaf Disease and Soil Moisture Inspection Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Computer Science > Robotics arXiv:2608.27545 (cs) [Submitted on 27 Aug 2026 ( v1 ), last revised 18 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title: Remote Human-Robot Interaction In Greenhouses via Virtual Reality: How Plant Canopy Structure Affects Leaf Disease and Soil Moisture Inspection Authors: Daniel Udekwe , Hasan Seyyedhasani View PDF Abstract: This study evaluates the effectiveness of remote human-robot interaction using virtual reality for leaf inspection and soil moisture assessment in a greenhouse environment. The robotic system comprised an unmanned ground vehicle and a robotic manipulator equipped with cameras, governed by kinematic models for navigation and manipulator control. Fourteen distinct plants were inspected across two experiments utilizing VR teleoperation, guided by a set of pre-specified research questions and hypotheses. In the leaf inspection experiments, cycle completion times varied from 3.3 to 8.0 s, and plant-based disease detection was achieved up to 88% accuracy; diseased-spot detection improved numerically in the second experiment, though this change was not statistically significant (p=0.378). For soil moisture assessment, the experiments achieved successful determination of watering needs in up to 64.3% of plants (9 of 14), with consistent success observed for plants 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, and 13; however, this improvement was likewise not statistically significant (p=0.50). A post hoc analysis instead revealed that soil moisture assessment reliability was strongly and significantly predicted by plant canopy morphology (p<0.01): plants with broad, single-leaf canopies reached 100% success by the second experiment, versus only 16.7% for dense, compound canopies. A secondary analysis showed operators became measurably faster at attempting dense-canopy plants without a corresponding gain in success, indicating that camera occlusion, not operator skill or effort, is the dominant limiting factor. These findings show occlusion imposes a sensing limitation rather than a control or training deficiency, and that adapting camera viewpoint and sensing strategy to canopy density is needed to improve the system's accuracy and robustness. Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO) ; Systems and Control (eess.SY) Cite as: arXiv:2608.27545 [cs.RO] (or arXiv:2608.27545v2 [cs.RO] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27545 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Daniel Udekwe [ view email ] [v1] Thu, 27 Aug 2026 16:37:59 UTC (1,721 KB) [v2] Fri, 18 Sep 2026 22:51:41 UTC (9,665 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View PDF view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.RO < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.SY eess eess.SY References & Citations SciX Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)

Related documents

Record · ID 780855 · SHA-256 9e9d93a24348b2e4
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive