Semantic Scholar
metadata only
Large Language Models for Chatbot Health Advice Studies
Key Points Question What do studies report when evaluating the performance of large language models (LLMs) providing health advice? Findings In this systematic review of 137 articles, 99.3% of the studies assessed closed-source models and did not provide enough information to identify the LLM. Most
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Large language model enhanced framework for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.#678448
- Do Large Language Models Favour Any Research Topics?#819778
- Do Large Language Models Favour Any Research Topics?#809782
- Can Large Language Models Identify When an Upper Extremity Problem Needs Nonurgent Attention? An Assessment of Multiple LLM Chatbots.#615729
- "AI Psychosis" in Context: How Conversation History Shapes LLM Responses to Delusional Beliefs#1142658
Record · ID 781890
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive