arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Do Large Language Models Favour Any Research Topics?
Large Language Models (LLMs) can estimate the quality of published journal articles, potentially supporting human assessment when evaluations are needed. Whilst there are reasons to believe that LLMs may have biases in this role, there is no statistically strong evidence yet. The current article add
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do Large Language Models Favour Any Research Topics?#819778
- Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects#792877
- Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects#788873
- Large Language Models for Chatbot Health Advice Studies#781890
- Large Language Models are not a One-Size-Fit All Solution for Archives and Records Management#983980
Record · ID 809782
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive