arXiv (All)
open access
Multi-Source Retrieval and Reasoning for Legal Sentencing Prediction
Legal judgment prediction (LJP) aims to predict judicial outcomes from case facts and typically includes law article, charge, and sentencing prediction. While recent methods perform well on the first two subtasks, legal sentencing prediction (LSP) remains difficult due to its need for fine-grained o
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- OBJECTION! Lawyer Agents Mitigate Guilty Bias in Legal Judgment Prediction#822554
- A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets, Metrics, Models and Challenges#335692
- Knowledge-Enhanced Deep Neural Network For Legal Judgment Prediction And Explanation#352759
- Limits of Predictability in Civil Litigation#615005
- Limits of Predictability in Civil Litigation#614038
Record · ID 799952
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive