arXiv (All)
open access
OBJECTION! Lawyer Agents Mitigate Guilty Bias in Legal Judgment Prediction
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) models are typically trained on documents that describe facts from a prosecutorial perspective. Existing datasets further exhibit severe label imbalance toward guilty outcomes. Consequently, these models suffer from "Guilty Bias", blindly accepting the prosecution's n
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Multi-Source Retrieval and Reasoning for Legal Sentencing Prediction#799952
- Historical Meme Profiles and Legal Language Models for Appellate Vote Alignment Prediction#692160
- Building Legal Reward Models for Grounding and Abstention#1084664
- PRILJ: an efficient two-step method based on embedding and clustering for the identification of regularities in legal case judgments#679167
- AI Alignment: The Structure of Objective Correction#687977
Record · ID 822554
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive