ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Assessment of Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
Currently, partial nephrectomy (PN) is considered as the gold standard treatment modality for small renal masses. In this setting, robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic approaches are gaining more consensus every day. However, until now, no superiority of one technique over the other has yet been demonstrated, especially on postoperative function recovery. This study compares oncological and functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus robot assisted partial nephrectomy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Outcomes of Multiple Platforms for Assisted Robotic-Kidney (COMPAR-K)#1085761
- Advantage of a Fast-recovery Protocol for Minimally Invasive Kidney Surgery#902703
- Comparison of Outcomes and Surgical Time Between Cortical and Medullary Suture vs. Medullary-Only Suture: Cortex Clinical Trial#878740
- ClAmpless, Sutureless PartIAl Nephrectomy for Renal Masses#812844
- Trifecta Achievement in Open and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy#1172606
Record · ID 803537
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive