ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Post-Surgical Outcomes of Conventional vs 3-Point Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Repair: An RCT
This is a single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial conducted in 2025-2025 at the General Surgery Ward of the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (SIUT), Karachi. This study shows the comparative analysis of polypropylene conventional mesh fixation versus 3-point fixation technique to assess Post-Surgical Outcomes in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Lichtenstein's Repair of Inguinal Hernia With Polypropylene Mesh Versus Surgisis#994740
- Absorbable Sutures , Non Absorbable Sutures or Biologic Fibrin Glue for Protesic Mesh Fixing in Lichtenstein Technique for Primitive Groin Hernia Repair: a Randomized Prospective Multicentric Trial#887550
- Study Evaluating the Impact of Mesh Pore Size on Chronic Pain After Lichtenstein Hernioplasty#1173286
- Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse#1126130
- Hernia Repair in Multiply Morbid Patients#826442
Record · ID 804689
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive