PhilArchive
open access
The Perversity of Weighted Voting
Weighted voting involves weighting representatives’ votes by the populations that they represent. Such systems have been adopted in some legislative bodies as a remedy for malapportionment, and are sometimes used to elect candidates for the executive branch of government. But they receive little attention. This note observes the neglected vices of weighted voting systems: they violate intuitive conditions of monotonicity and participation. These vices count significantly against the use of weighted voting, and reflecting on why they arise improves our understanding of axioms in social choice theory.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Choice-Based Cardinal Utility. A Tribute to Patrick Suppes#754603
- On the Equivalence of the Graph-Structural and Optimization-Based Characterizations of Popular Matchings#798627
- On the Equivalence of the Graph-Structural and Optimization-Based Characterizations of Popular Matchings#797214
- Representative democracy and the implementation of majority-preferred alternatives#217984
- Arrow's Impossibility Theorem as a Generalisation of Condorcet's Paradox#1123954
Record · ID 80676
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive