ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Clinical Performance of Injection-Molding Vs. Incremental Packing of Resin Composite in Cavitated Posterior Teeth
The clinical performance of 2 bonding and composite packing techniques in the proximal cavities of permanent posterior teeth will be assessed. Incremental packing with pre-curing of universal adhesive in selective etching mode is compared to injection molding of preheated composing co-cured with universal adhesive in selective-etch. Main outcomes will focus on marginal integrity, post-operative hypersensitivity, and contact form and tightness.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Two Universal Composites in Posterior Teeth#902425
- Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations#1087735
- Clinical Performance of Restorations in Teeth Affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralization#980463
- Clinical Evaluation of Compomer and Composite Class II Restorations in Primary Molars: 24 Months Results#812237
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Restoring of Primary Molars#1094930
Record · ID 806802
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive