ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Intubation Using Video Laryngeal Mask and Video Laryngoscope in Elective Surgical Patients
This study compares two airway devices that are commonly used during elective surgery: the video laryngeal mask airway (VLM) and the video laryngoscope (VLS). Both are part of routine anesthesia practice. Our main focus is to measure how long intubation takes with each device and to see how successful the intubation is. The study does not involve any extra procedures or risks; everything will be carried out as part of normal patient care.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Effect of The Use of a Videolaryngoscope and/or Stylet on Intubation Time in Obese Patients#1125517
- Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopes in Difficult Airway#807291
- McGrath Video Laryngoscope for All Intubations in the Operating Room#1113273
- Video Laryngoscope Versus USB Borescope in Difficult Intubation#1008563
- Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope#811277
Record · ID 807313
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive