ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Proof of Concept of the Aiinane Preoperative Risk Assessment Tool.
BACKGROUND: Each year, over 13,000 patients in Catalonia and more than 4 million worldwide experience last-minute surgery cancellations (LMC) due to preoperative inefficiencies. As anaesthesia services struggle to meet surgical demands, thorough preoperative evaluations become challenging. Current resource-intensive pre-anaesthetic assessments are undermined by high demand, causing inefficiency. However, proper assessment identifies that most patients (\>70%) are low-risk and ensures high-risk patients are adequately prepared by analyzing risk profiles, health status, medical history, treatment, and lab results. RATIONALE: Previous attempts to improve preoperative risk assessment have mainly relied on self-administered questionnaires to detect at-risk patients. The investigators have identified a care model that enhances quality by adding value to preoperative risk assessment. By combining anaesthesiology expertise with AI techniques, the investigators developed an automated digital environment to detect risks, optimize visits, avoid cancellations, and reduce postoperative complications. This system uses parameterized medical knowledge to verify responses and objectively assess patient risk by integrating multiple data sources. The investigators have developed a Class IIa active diagnostic and monitoring product, a Medical Device Software (MDSW, EMDN V92), to support clinical decision-making in an automated digital preoperative environment. It helps assess patients and flags low-risk from medium/high-risk individuals, reporting personalized needs to the medical team. The software was developed exclusively by independent researchers from Bellvitge University Hospital and the Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL). HYPOTHESIS: The tool has been tested successfully on fictitious patients in controlled preclinical scenarios. The aim now is a proof-of-concept study to verify its performance with real patients in uncontrolled, real-world settings. This is a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinicians' Perspectives on Pre-Anaesthetic Assessment and Their Attitudes Towards AI-Supported Models: Protocol for an International Survey of Anaesthesia Personnel.#630915
- Explainable artificial intelligence for postoperative analgesia risk stratification and clinical decision support in abdominal surgery.#465142
- Knowledge About Anaesthesiology and Anaesthesiologists#880214
- Prediction of Local Anaesthetic Dosing During Labour Epidural Analgesia#854004
- Predicting Morbidity and Mortality in Elderly Surgical Patients#1112497
Record · ID 811396
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive