arXiv (All)
open access
trajectory-judge: What Outcome-Only LLM Judges Miss on Agent Trajectories
Outcome-only evaluation is the production default for LLM agents: show a judge the request and the final reply and ask whether it was handled well. The metric is structurally blind to an agent that reaches the right answer the wrong way. We measure that blind spot where ground truth is known by cons
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- trajectory-judge: What Outcome-Only LLM Judges Miss on Agent Trajectories#809530
- Opening LLM Judges: Recovering Preference Signals Beyond the Final Verdict#1116738
- Pair Difficulty Matters: Rethinking Pairwise LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation and Consistency#1141894
- Before Agents Decide: Epistemic Action in LLM-Based Systems#1155446
- Do Proactive Agents Need an LLM to Decide When to Act?#1130565
Record · ID 819526
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive