arXiv (All)
open access
GuidedBench: Measuring and Mitigating the Evaluation Discrepancies of In-the-wild LLM Jailbreak Methods
Despite the growing interest in jailbreaks as an effective red-teaming tool for building safe and responsible large language models (LLMs), flawed evaluation system designs have led to significant discrepancies in their effectiveness assessments. With a systematic measurement study based on 37 jailb
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How Many Iterations to Jailbreak? Dynamic Budget Allocation for Multi-Turn LLM Evaluation#1104437
- Classifying Interpretive Canons at the Sentence Level: A Benchmark from the German Federal Constitutional Court#1063156
- Breaking the Code: Security Assessment of AI Code Agents Through Systematic Jailbreaking Attacks#798652
- Breaking the Code: Security Assessment of AI Code Agents Through Systematic Jailbreaking Attacks#797238
- Mind the Gap: How SBOM Specification Ambiguities Lead to Divergent Software Bills of Materials. An Empirical Tool Study#1014965
Record · ID 820184
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive