arXiv (All)
open access
Dense Process Supervision for Search Agents via Fact Utility Estimation
Reinforcement learning (RL) for search agents typically relies on outcome rewards. However, it often fails to achieve effective credit assignment, due to the unclear value of intermediate steps. It is hard to separate their contributions from the final result. In this paper, we propose a dense proce
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Verbalized Confidence: Calibrating Reasoners with Differentiable Readouts#1129470
- Asymmetric Human Compensation: Why High-Recall AI Outperforms Theoretically Optimal Profiles in Collaborative Quality Inspection#160522
- Althea: The Fact-Checking--Metalearning Tradeoff in AI-Assisted Verification#1049753
- An Imperfect Verifier is Good Enough: Learning with Noisy Rewards#1117363
- The Dark Room in the Reward Channel: Dense Prediction Rewards Collapse GRPO-Trained LLM Agents -- and What Actually Works#394420
Record · ID 820838
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive