arXiv (All)
open access
The Utility of LLMs in Recommender Systems Explanation Evaluation
Explanations play a crucial role in creating trustworthy recommender systems (RS), yet choosing a good explanation method presents challenges. Many explanation methods exist, but little guidance exists on which is best for which setting. Existing explanation generation methods often produce abstract
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Systematic Review of Human-Centered Explainability in Reinforcement Learning: Transferring the RCC Framework to Support Epistemic Trustworthiness#707577
- From Explanation to Exploration: Promoting DivErsity in Recommendation Systems#185546
- Neutralizing Popularity Bias in LLM-based Recommendation via Counterfactual Reasoning Guidelines#972904
- XAI-Arena: Can LLMs Assess the Quality of XAI Explanations?#987176
- The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations#819452
Record · ID 822066
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive