arXiv (All)
open access
Learning Evidence Sufficiency Boundaries for Selective Answering in Grounded Multi-Hop QA
Grounded question answering systems should answer only when the supplied evidence supports the answer. In multi-hop QA, this requirement is difficult because partial evidence can make an unsupported answer appear plausible. We study selective answering through evidence sufficiency boundaries: for th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- HyperProve: Answer-Guided Hypergraph Expansion for Multi-Hop Question Answering#1083269
- Option-Aware Retrieval and Task-Specific VLM Adaptation for Medical VQA#1109528
- Intrinsic Sequence-Likelihood Confidence in Retrieval-Dominated Extractive QA: Two Pre-Specified Negatives, and What They Do and Do Not Attribute#1014987
- CiteGuard-RAG: A Validation-Centered AI System for Evidence-Grounded Question Answering#1109870
- Where to Look and What to Use: Retrieve-Localize-Generate for Long-Term Conversational Memory Question Answering#1109154
Record · ID 822120
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive