arXiv (All)
open access
ClaimReceipt: Verifying Evidence Sufficiency and Coverage in Agent Evaluations
Agent evaluations face two distinct evidentiary questions: whether a reported claim is recomputable from retained evidence (sufficiency), and whether the retained records cover the committed experiment set (coverage). Generic logs and hash-linked transcripts answer neither reliably. We introduce Cla
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Correct Is Not Governed: Provenance Integrity in Agentic Workflows#451245
- Auditing Agent Actions through Query-Conditioned Attribution#1118749
- Actions with Receipts: Jointly Binding Claims, Evidence, and Execution for Replayable Tool-Agent Auditing#1154950
- FAVA: Formal Authorization for Verified Agents with Evidence-Backed Permission Graphs#414062
- Poster: Towards ProofWeave: A Privacy-Minimised, Integrity-Anchored Evidence Plane for Continuous Agentic Assurance#1129828
Record · ID 822401
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive