arXiv (All)
open access
Auditing Agent Actions through Query-Conditioned Attribution
LLM agents increasingly take consequential actions through interactions with users, policies, and external tools. Auditing these agents requires automated attribution of realized actions to their historical basis. However, existing attribution formulations do not provide question-specific traces for
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Actions with Receipts: Jointly Binding Claims, Evidence, and Execution for Replayable Tool-Agent Auditing#1154950
- Do LLM Attribution Metrics Transfer? Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation Across Datasets and Constructs#1013597
- Notarized Agents: Receiver-Attested Confidential Receipts for AI Agent Actions#259435
- ClaimReceipt: Verifying Evidence Sufficiency and Coverage in Agent Evaluations#822401
- Auditing Web Agent Evaluation on WebArena-Lite: Human Review of Outcomes and Trajectories#1156763
Record · ID 1118749
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive