The Learning Edge
metadata only
Coercive signaling, cognitive warfare, or total war? Legal and strategic reflections on the US–Israel–Iran war
Critical infrastructure is not attacked only for what its destruction immediately achieves. It may also be placed at risk to communicate capability, shape expectations and alter an adversary’s political choices. Responding effectively, therefore, requires protection of both the physical system and t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Governance and Regulation of Autonomous Weapons and Cybersecurity (2016–2024): The Influence of States, International Organizations, and Civil Society on International Humanitarian Law#729741
- DP18545: Strategic Reasoning and Sensitivity to Stakes in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games: LLMs vs. Human Proposers#130035
- Circulatory Propaganda, Narrative Media, and the Rhythms of Digital Conflict#134390
- El derecho de la Unión Europea y las plataformas digitales: entre la política social y la protección algorítmica#222414
- Hostile Scaffolding#114309
Record · ID 824338
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive