ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of the I-gel, Supreme and Proseal LMA in Paralyzed Patients
The investigators aimed to compare of the i-gel, supreme and proseal laryngeal mask airways in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with oropharyngeal leak pressure. The investigators also studied their relative ease of insertion, time to insertion and complications of use as secondary outcome measures.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ambu AuraGain vs LMA Supreme in Laparoscopic Surgery#982319
- Crossover Study of the LMA SupremeTM vs Ambu-Aura GainTM#875229
- The Effect Of I-Gel And Ambu Aura-I Use On Laryngofaryngeal Mucosa#1075213
- A New Insertion Technique for Laryngeal Mask Airway#878640
- The Effects of GMA-TULIP, I-gel, and BlockBuster Laryngeal Mask in Laparoscopic Surgeries With Trendelenburg Position Under General Anesthesia#837018
Record · ID 825050
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive