ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Ambu AuraGain vs LMA Supreme in Laparoscopic Surgery
The aim of the study is to compare the performance of two supraglottic airway devices (SGA), the new Ambu AuraGain and the LMA Supreme, in sixty female patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy in the trendelemburg position. Primary outcome is the airway seal pressure. Secondary outcomes are ease of insertion, quality of ventilation, endoscopic view of the glottis, gastric tube passage and complications.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of the I-gel, Supreme and Proseal LMA in Paralyzed Patients#825050
- LMA Protector vs I-Gel in Low-Flow Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#1085344
- Postoperative Sore Throat in Children: Comparison Between Two Supraglottic Devices, Ambu® AuraOnce™ Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and I-Gel®.#1088135
- Laryngeal View With Videolaryngoscopy#1059039
- Transcricoid Injection vs. Spray as You go Method for Local Anaesthesia During Bronchoscopy#979833
Record · ID 982319
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive