PhilArchive
open access
Pre-Generative AI perspectives: Risk and promise in Vietnam’s state media narratives on artificial intelligence (2016–2022)
This study analyzes 324 online news articles published by five major Vietnamese state newspapers between 2016 and 2022. Besides rating the tone of each article as being positive, negative, or neutral, we also subject these articles to a rigorous thematic coding scheme; each article is read and coded nominally for whether it mentions AI-related topics such as AI ethics, risks, development, investment, AI public events, policies, etc. The analyses show the majority of news reports on AI are event-related, with 194 articles (59.8%) published about 151 unique AI-related events. Concurring with the literature on AI-related narratives, we conclude that industry actors are the main drivers of media narratives about AI. Hence, it is not surprising that the three major narratives are first, the prevailing optimism regarding AI development and application; second, the emphasis on AI development as one of the key contributors to the national stature; and third, the shallow discussion of AI ethics. We find the number of negative news items was dismissed at 4, equivalent to merely 1.23%, whereas that of neutral news items was 47, or 14.5%. Problematically, there is a stark shortage of editorial, op-ed, and in-depth feature articles explaining various ethical and social issues related to AI deployment. The AI-related ethical issues, such as privacy violations, gendered bias, etc., are merely listed as talking points and are being overshadowed by the narrative of ‘efficiency,’ ‘cybersecurity,’ ideological security,’ and ‘strategic advantage.’ Moreover, we also provide an explanation for the limited attention that AI-related ethical issues receive from government newspapers in Vietnam, attributing it to the lack of a philosophical foundation for the discussion on AI ethics and the optimistic view on AI of the Vietnamese state's journals is tied to the way the Vietnamese government is gaining legitimacy, that is, through economic developments.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can Conservatism Mitigate the AI Alignment Problem?#688544
- Rethinking Media Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence#133004
- Should We Be Morally Accountable for AI Behavior? A Novel Framework for Distributed Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence Systems#167117
- AI agents can coordinate beyond human scale#820154
- COMPENSATORY JUSTICE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW#1176646
Record · ID 82707
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive