ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Arch Expansion Changes Between Passive Self-ligating and Conventional Brackets
The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the transverse development of the arches and the incisor inclination comparing two different ligating systems (SL vs CL) with the same arch form protocol (Damon arch form) and the same disarticulation protocols after the alignment and leveling period of non-extraction patients.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A New Ligation Using the Double-loop Clips Technique Versus Traditional Techniques in the Treatment of Large Wounds After Endoscopic Resection#867339
- One Year Skeletal and Dental Arch Changes Following Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment in Children#852697
- Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing THD Versus Stapler Operation for 3rd Degree Hemorrhoids#1164299
- BS-CERAB TECHNIQUE#1115027
- Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes With Palatal Plate Versus Conventional Tooth Borne Anchorage in Class III Patients#862433
Record · ID 836372
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive