ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
One Year Skeletal and Dental Arch Changes Following Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment in Children
Many author have exposed the rapid and slow expansion, the diversity of activation and containment protocols and the follow-up time, justify the need for more studies to evaluate the effects to the ERM for the long-term.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Arch Expansion Changes Between Passive Self-ligating and Conventional Brackets#836372
- Comparison of Two Tooth-borne Expanders in Rapid Maxillary Expansion#836257
- Dentoskeletal Effects of the Expander With Differential Opening and the Fan-type Expander#1032829
- Anterior Open Bite Treatment With Bonded Spurs Associated With Build-ups Versus Conventional Bonded Spurs#869019
- Dento-skeletal Effects of Quadhelix Versus Mini-hyrax Expanders in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate at the Mixed Dentition Stage: A Randomized Clinical Trial#1173468
Record · ID 852697
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive