ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Efficacy Study of Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon, -Stent vs. Plain Angioplasty for Drug-eluting Stent Restenosis
The purpose of this randomized study is to determine which treatment option, either paclitaxel-eluting balloon, paclitaxel-eluting stent or plain balloon angioplasty is the most effective in the treatment of restenosis after implantation of "Limus"-eluting stents, (LES).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Drug-eluting Stents vs. Drug-coated Balloon for Preventing Recurrent In-stent Restenosis#887495
- Prospective, Multi-Center, Random. Study of CoStar Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent(Direct Stenting vs. Pre-Dilatation)#824950
- Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Angioplasty With a Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon for Femoral Artery In-stent Restenosis#881934
- SYNTAX Study: TAXUS Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Narrowed Arteries#834900
- Abbott Next Generation Drug Eluting Stent 48mm Study#982418
Record · ID 838565
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive