ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Angioplasty With a Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon for Femoral Artery In-stent Restenosis
Comparison of recurrent-restenosis rates 6 months after angioplasty of in-stent restenoses or in-stent reocclusions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) using either a standard balloon (Admiral Xtreme, Invatec) or a paclitaxel-eluting balloon (In.Pact™ Admiral, Invatec).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficacy Study of Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon, -Stent vs. Plain Angioplasty for Drug-eluting Stent Restenosis#838565
- Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon and Conventional Balloon for In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery#907126
- Registry of Cutting Balloon and DCB Intervention in Femoropopliteal Stenosis/Occlusion.#902564
- Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter for Prevention of Restenosis in Femoropopliteal Arteries#1165248
- The Efficacy of Heparin-boned Viabahn Endoprosthesis and Paclitaxel-coated Balloons for Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions#885636
Record · ID 881934
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive