ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Modified Wet Suction Versus Capillary Techniques for EUS Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy of Solid Lesions
The purpose of the study is to compare two particular techniques of tissue (capillary vs wet-suction techniques) sampling during endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) of a solid lesion to determine the diagnostic yield and procedure logistics (e.g. procedure time).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Masses: Histological and Immunohistochemical Evaluation#840837
- Evaluation of Diagnostic Yield of EUS-Guided Tissue Sampling#851623
- EUS-FNA With 22G Procore Needles vs 22G Conventional Needles#865788
- A Randomized Prospective Comparison of the New EUS Guided Acquire TM Needle Biopsy vs EUS Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Suspected Solid Gastrointestinal Lesions#992732
- Comparison of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Technique#1152106
Record · ID 839231
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive