ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
GlideScope Versus Direct Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation
The purpose of this study is to assess if the GlideScope video laryngoscope is superior to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for definitive airway management in acutely-injured patients.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope#914331
- Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices#888556
- Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopes in Difficult Airway#807291
- McGrath Video Laryngoscope for All Intubations in the Operating Room#1113273
- McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion#1127383
Record · ID 846655
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive