ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Prospective Study Comparing CSF Shunt Flow Between "Virtual Off" and "Flow Permissive" Shunt Valve Settings Using a Wireless, Noninvasive Shunt Flow Sensor
Hydrocephalus is commonly treated with a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt, a device that drains excess fluid from the brain. However, shunts can stop working over time, and determining whether fluid is flowing through a shunt can be difficult. Current diagnostic methods may require imaging studies or invasive procedures, which can be time-consuming, costly, or uncomfortable for patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of the Rhaeos Shunt Monitoring System (RSMS), an investigational wireless, noninvasive device designed to detect flow in implanted CSF shunts. The study will compare RSMS directly with ShuntCheck III, an FDA-cleared noninvasive device that is also used to assess CSF shunt flow. Both devices are placed on the skin over the shunt and use thermal sensing technology to evaluate whether fluid is flowing through the shunt. Approximately 85 pediatric and adult participants with an existing ventricular CSF shunt will be enrolled. Some participants with programmable shunt valves will have their valve temporarily adjusted to a manufacturer-provided "virtual off" setting, which is intended to substantially restrict shunt flow. These participants may also undergo measurements at their normal valve setting. Other participants will only undergo measurements at their normal valve setting. During the study visit, participants will undergo shunt flow assessments with both RSMS and ShuntCheck III. The order in which the devices are used will be randomized. Device measurements are collected while participants are seated upright, and participants and their treating clinicians will remain blinded to the measurement results. The study devices will not be used to make treatment decisions, and participation will not alter standard medical care. Adverse events associated with device use or valve adjustments will be monitored and recorded. The primary goal of the study is to compare the performance of RSMS and ShuntCheck III in assessing shunt flow
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Use of Lumbar Drain to Remove Clots in Patients Admitted to the Neuro-ICU After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.#1058320
- Assessment of CSF Shunt Flow and Headaches With a Thermal Measurement Device#837402
- Detection and Classification of Levels of Consciousness Using Parietal EEG-fNIRS During Anesthesia#859243
- Bed Rest on the Effect of CSF Leakage Repair After Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery#969996
- Assessing the Accuracy and the Impact of Standard-practice Ventricular Drainage on Intracranial Pressure Measurements Following Traumatic Brain Injury#832779
Record · ID 847136
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive