ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Three Cannulas for Hysterosalpingography
The aim of this study is to compare the three commonly used hysterosalpingography (HSG) injection devices on the basis of patient pain perception, total fluoroscopic and procedural time, and side effects in a prospective, randomized study. An important and novel secondary outcome is the comparison of the quality of images obtained with these three devices. The investigators hypothesize that the balloon catheter and cervical vacuum cup will be less painful than the acorn tipped cannula and that there will be no difference in image quality between the three groups.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pain Relief During Intravenous Cannulation in Pediatric Patients#845038
- Mini-hysteroscopy Versus Conventional Office Hysteroscopy in Nulliparous Patients Undergoing Office Hysteroscopy#869057
- Pain in Different Office Hysteroscopy Diameter#883949
- Comparison of Operative Hysteroscopy Performed in the Operating Room Versus Outpatient Settings#911338
- Effects of Cervical Lidocaine Spray on Pain Relief During Manual Vacuum Aspiration#1045057
Record · ID 847794
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive